Trending Topics >>
Saturday, April 19, 2014

Book Review

American Paranoids

600x451

The United States of Paranoia is witty, smart, and more than a little subversive. Ranging confidently through history and popular culture—from the Indian wars of Puritan New England to Andrew Jackson assassination conspiracy theory and the deconstructive tricksters behind Discordianism’s Operation Mindfuck, from Nathaniel Hawthorne’s “Young Goodman Brown” to Jack Chick’s Evangelicalist comic books—Walker shows that conspiracism is far from just a foible of the fringe.

“When I say virtually everyone is capable of paranoid thinking,” he declares, “I really do mean virtually everyone, including you, me, and the founding fathers.” The managing editor of the libertarian magazine Reason, Walker is a far cry from a Birther or a New World Order fanatic of the Alex Jones persuasion. But he doesn’t grant much deference to the two-party establishment either.

Conspiracists 
are primed to believe that the government lies to them because it so manifestly does.

And why would he? It’s a little rich to think that the Warren Commission relied upon “objective” investigations conducted by the CIA and the FBI: these agencies were the architects of such paranoia-inducing programs as MKUltra, which tested LSD on unwitting civilians, and COINTELPRO, which planted provocateurs and double agents in far left- and right-wing organizations throughout the 1950s and 1960s. As irrational as the 9/11 Truth movement might be, the bipartisan panic that inflated Al Qaeda into a global superpower, giving rise to the PATRIOT Act, with its secret searches and warrantless internet surveillance, not to mention the foreign quagmires that killed thousands of American soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Afghani and Iraqi civilians, had consequences that were far worse.

Walker’s larger point is one that historian Kathryn Olmsted makes in Real Enemies: Conspiracy Theories and American Democracy, a volume that Walker refers to and quotes from. Government officials have long “promoted a certain conspiracist style,” Olmsted writes, “but they wanted to maintain the power to construct these conspiracy theories themselves and quash those that did not serve official interests.” Whether the topic is Pearl Harbor, Building Number 7, or Area 51, conspiracists are primed to believe that the government lies to them because it so manifestly does.

Walker is no racist and he is too much of an ironist to make use of Ron Paul tropes like “treason” and “tyranny.” But he is quick to defend racists and militias when they are, as he sees it, unfairly demonized. He tellingly contrasts the influence that John Todd—who claimed to be a defector from the Satanic Illuminati and enjoyed a brief celebrity in the 1970s—had on Kerry Noble, a founder of the racist paramilitary group the Covenant, the Sword, and the Arm of the Lord, and on Randy and Vicki Weaver. Noble, whose CSA targeted Jews, blacks and gays, was imprisoned on federal weapons charges in the mid-1980s. The Weaver family won a $3.1 million settlement from the federal government after a marshal killed Randy Weaver’s son and FBI snipers wounded him and killed his wife at their home in Ruby Ridge, Idaho, in 1992.

“If the story of the CSA shows how a marginal group’s paranoia about the government can drive it to violence,” he writes, “the tale of the Weavers shows how the government’s paranoia about marginal groups can drive it to violence.” During the siege at Waco a year later, Walker writes, the media and the government spread the “same sorts of fables” about the Davidians “that the medieval authorities told about Jews and heretics.”

For Walker, The United States of Paranoia is the antidote to Richard Hofstadter’s 1964 essay “The Paranoid Style in American Politics,” which betrayed the same paranoia about the far right, he says, that it accused the far right of having about everyone else. And yet Walker has a gigantic blind spot of his own.

For writers like Hofstadter and myself, it is not simply that the far right is paranoid or deluded or dishonest, or that it suffers from epistemic closure—the closed-mindedness that precludes thought, distorts reality, and often leads to extremist fantasy. The specific contents of extreme conservative beliefs matter too, as do the objects of their paranoia.

Governments lie to acquire, exploit, and keep power; to that extent conspiracism is an important part of any politician’s propagandistic toolkit. But at a certain bedrock level, the paranoid style that Hofstadter wrote about—the “overheated, oversuspicious, overaggressive, grandiose, and apocalyptic” conviction that a secret adversary has wormed its way into the heart of the establishment—becomes a kind of theology and one that turns on an absolute idea about the way things are—and on the immutable nature of the supposed enemy.

The ubiquity of The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion in conspiracist circles is a matter of unconcern to Walker. Trying to link together all the groups that believe in it, he says, resembles “Woody Allen’s syllogism ‘Socrates is a man. All men are mortal. Therefore, all men are Socrates.’” I couldn’t disagree more.

As flawed as it is, the American experiment is premised on Enlightenment humanism. The paranoid conspiracism described by Hofstadter and epitomized by the Protocols, in contrast, proposes that some among us, whether Jewish bankers or heirs to ancient astronauts, owe their ultimate allegiance to Satan.

That these conspiracists have remained as influential as they have is something to be paranoid about.


Arthur Goldwag’s most recent book is The New Hate: A History of Fear and Loathing on the Populist Right. You can follow him on Twitter at @ArthurGoldwag.


Like this article? Get more free!
We'll send you a round-up of the best of the Spectator's journalism and political commentary as well as special offers and information so you can take action on issues you care most about. Sign up today!

 

 

THE LATEST

 


[Environment]

A Fossil-Fueled Market Bubble

By Brett Fleishman

 

Why hasn’t Wall Street imploded over this yet? Well, remember how “nobody” could see the housing bubble coming?

Read

 


[Economics]

How to End California’s Water Crisis

By Polly Cleveland and Mason Gaffney

 

California farmers get their water free, or close to free. Any of us who have taken elementary economics should be shouting from the rooftops or blasting through cyberspace: if you make something free, you will get waste and shortages!

Read

 


[Media]

Good News and Bad News about News

By Emily Schwartz Greco and William A.
Collins

 

The news business does look better than it did not long ago. How about the actual quality of what’s being reported? It's generally bad.

Read

 


 
SUBSCRIBE!

 

83¢ an issue is our unconscionably low introductory rate. The Spectator is reader-supported and depends on you!

 

Click here for more details

 


[National Security]

A Tortured Twist on Ethics

By Yosef Brody

 

Why isn't the American Psychological Association pursuing ethics charges against psychologist John Leso for abuses he helped carry out at the Guantánamo prison?

Read

 


[Foreign Policy]

The Diplomatic Dance with Iran

By Chris Toensing

 

Iran might stumble but the Obama administration should take the greatest possible care not to trip its partner.

Read

 


[Economics]

A Long, Gilded Life

By Sam Pizzigati

 

The last link between America's plutocratic past and present has left us.

Read

 


[Politics]

No-Fault Gun Laws

By Peter Lindstrom

 

The increasing number of lax gun laws in many states are one reason all gun deaths (homicide, suicide and accident) been growing steadily since 2000.

Read

 


[Economics]

You Get What You Don’t Pay For

By Ryan Alexander

 

No matter how hard lawmakers try to close their eyes, click their heels, and hope for the best, they can’t make highway funding magically appear. But that doesn’t stop them fiddling and flailing as they burn through the Highway Trust Fund.

Read

 


[Politics]

America Has Long Been Twitchy about Its Sphere of Influence

By Jim Sleeper

 

The best reasons to impose strong sanctions against Russian-nationalist tyranny aren’t anthropological but liberal and, yes, geopolitical.

Read

 


 

GET MORE!

 

We'll send you the best of the Spectator every week.

 

Enter your email address below and sign up today!

 

 


 

 

  • Create an account
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.