Trending Topics >>
Saturday, April 19, 2014

Foreign Policy

If Hillary Doesn’t Back Obama on Iran

HillaryClintonObamaAddressNationalPrayerWmrBDiTNGLNl

There can be little doubt that Hillary Clinton lost the 2008 nomination for president because she voted to authorize the Iraq War. If she had opposed it, there would have been no rationale for the Obama candidacy. It is likely that she, not President Obama, would now be in the White House.

It seems crazy. But Clinton might see history repeat itself.

If she doesn't, progressive Democrats will need to find another candidate. Just like we did last time.

Today, Obama’s effort to achieve a peaceful resolution of our differences with Iran through diplomacy and not war is under serious attack by the same neoconservative claque that promoted the Iraq War. Almost a veto-proof majority of senators is supporting new Iran sanctions that would, if implemented, almost surely cause the Iranians to walk away from the negotiating table. According to the White House, that would greatly increase the chances for war.

Last night, in his State of the Union address, Obama made clear that he will veto any new Iran sanctions so long as there is a chance that negotiations could succeed. His language was strong, leaving no doubt that he views the new sanctions bill as dangerous to U.S. interests:

But let me be clear: If this Congress sends me a new sanctions bill now that threatens to derail these talks, I will veto it. For the sake of our national security, we must give diplomacy a chance to succeed.

Obama’s forcefulness on this issue is good news. It couldn’t be more obvious that the last thing he wants in the remainder of his term is another war.

But where is his former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton? So far she has had nothing to say about the Congressional initiative to block Obama’s Iran diplomacy. But she has to know that if she forcefully supported what Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry are trying to do, unsure Democrats would likely follow her lead.

But where is she? I suspect that she is doing what she did back when she had to make her decision about the Iraq War. Weighing policy considerations against the desires of some of her hawkish supporters.

Hopefully, I am wrong. Hopefully she will support Obama and make clear that the United States will pursue a diplomatic solution with Iran— ot war, by us or Israel—if she becomes president.

If she won’t do that, if she makes the same mistake twice, progressive Democrats will need to find another candidate. Just like we did last time.


M.J. Rosenberg is a Special Correspondent for The Washington Spectator. He was most recently a Foreign Policy fellow at Media Matters For America. Previously, he spent 15 years as a Senate and House aide. Early in his career he was editor of AIPAC's newsletter Near East Report. From 1998-2009, he was director of policy at Israel Policy Forum. Follow him @MJayRosenberg.


Like this article? Get more free!
We'll send you a round-up of the best of the Spectator's journalism and political commentary as well as special offers and information so you can take action on issues you care most about. Sign up today!

 

 

THE LATEST

 


[Environment]

A Fossil-Fueled Market Bubble

By Brett Fleishman

 

Why hasn’t Wall Street imploded over this yet? Well, remember how “nobody” could see the housing bubble coming?

Read

 


[Economics]

How to End California’s Water Crisis

By Polly Cleveland and Mason Gaffney

 

California farmers get their water free, or close to free. Any of us who have taken elementary economics should be shouting from the rooftops or blasting through cyberspace: if you make something free, you will get waste and shortages!

Read

 


[Media]

Good News and Bad News about News

By Emily Schwartz Greco and William A.
Collins

 

The news business does look better than it did not long ago. How about the actual quality of what’s being reported? It's generally bad.

Read

 


 
SUBSCRIBE!

 

83¢ an issue is our unconscionably low introductory rate. The Spectator is reader-supported and depends on you!

 

Click here for more details

 


[National Security]

A Tortured Twist on Ethics

By Yosef Brody

 

Why isn't the American Psychological Association pursuing ethics charges against psychologist John Leso for abuses he helped carry out at the Guantánamo prison?

Read

 


[Foreign Policy]

The Diplomatic Dance with Iran

By Chris Toensing

 

Iran might stumble but the Obama administration should take the greatest possible care not to trip its partner.

Read

 


[Economics]

A Long, Gilded Life

By Sam Pizzigati

 

The last link between America's plutocratic past and present has left us.

Read

 


[Politics]

No-Fault Gun Laws

By Peter Lindstrom

 

The increasing number of lax gun laws in many states are one reason all gun deaths (homicide, suicide and accident) been growing steadily since 2000.

Read

 


[Economics]

You Get What You Don’t Pay For

By Ryan Alexander

 

No matter how hard lawmakers try to close their eyes, click their heels, and hope for the best, they can’t make highway funding magically appear. But that doesn’t stop them fiddling and flailing as they burn through the Highway Trust Fund.

Read

 


[Politics]

America Has Long Been Twitchy about Its Sphere of Influence

By Jim Sleeper

 

The best reasons to impose strong sanctions against Russian-nationalist tyranny aren’t anthropological but liberal and, yes, geopolitical.

Read

 


 

GET MORE!

 

We'll send you the best of the Spectator every week.

 

Enter your email address below and sign up today!

 

 


 

 

  • Create an account
    *
    *
    *
    *
    *
    Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required.