Select Page

5 Pipelines to Break Even

There are five pipelines under consideration to move tar-sands oil from Alberta to shipping ports. All five are needed for investors to break even
by Lou Dubose

Mar 1, 2015 | Politics



Builder: TransCanada. Capacity: 830,000 barrels a day. Cost: $8 billion. Backstory: runs from Hardisty, Alberta, south through the U.S. Midwest to Houston, Texas.

Builder: Kinder Morgan. Capacity: 540,000 barrels a day. Cost: $5.4 billion. Backstory: runs parallel to existing line, would carry bitumen from Edmonton to Burnaby, B.C.

Builder: Enbridge Inc. Capacity: 525,000 barrels a day. Cost: $7.9 billion. Backstory: runs from Bruderheim, Alberta, to Kitimat, B.C. Approved by Ottawa in 2014, but faces opposition from aboriginal communities.

Builder: Imperial Oil Co. Capacity: Unknown Cost: Undetermined. Backstory:
runs north from the tar sands through the Northwest Territories to Tuktoyaktuk on the Arctic coast. Strong opposition from environmentalists.

Builder: TransCanada. Capacity: 1.1 million barrels a day. Cost: $12 billion. Backstory: convert parts of natural gas line from Alberta to Ontario to carry bitumen to Ontario, then add a new line through Quebec to Halifax, New Brunswick.

Read On:

Share This Story:

1 Comment

  1. For his yuletide ’14 gift for me, my brother David gave me a subscription of the Washington Spectator – and carried it over to ’15. I’ve enjoyed and benefited from his excellent gift – and especially enjoyed the lead story in your March ’15 issue.

    Unfortunately, I’ve misplaced it. Am I able to order a replacement based on my subscriber-ship?

We collect email addresses for the sole purpose of communicating more efficiently with our Washington Spectator readers and Public Concern Foundation supporters.  We will never sell or give your email address to any 3rd party.  We will always give you a chance to opt out of receiving future emails, but if you’d like to control what emails you get, just click here.