Historians (if they exist in the future and any records of this period survive) will note this month as one where the United States slipped fully into authoritarianism. Incompetence, luck, and real leadership may yet intervene, but we have already crossed several “red lines” warned about by experts.
At the TED conference this past week in Vancouver, British Columbia, about 1,700 multidisciplinary thinkers gathered to hear and discuss dozens of prepared talks. But the real action was among the attendees, who gathered all week in impromptu salon discussions to share their concerns about the state of the world and what can be done to change course. Here are some of the most discussed topics and themes.
It’s a Coup
Carole Cadwalladr, a journalist who has reported on tech overreach and the rise of data-driven authoritarianism, delivered a powerful talk in which she correctly stated what many are afraid to admit: It’s a coup. The purchase of an American president (and American sovereignty) by Elon Musk is unprecedented, and it appears to be advancing unabated.
In her conference-opening talk, she also confronted OpenAI CEO Sam Altman about the theft of her intellectual property to train the company’s AI systems. When TED’s Chris Anderson brought up this concern with Altman in an interview during the final conference session (with Cadwalladr applauding) Altman’s response directed to her was, “Clap all you want to about that. Enjoy.” When Cadwalladr confronted him again privately backstage, he waved her off, citing “fair use.”
Chris Anderson in conversation with Sam Altman at TED 2025. (Photo: David Troy)
While the TED community is comprised of a wide range of people, a broad majority of participants appeared to align with Cadwalladr, agreeing that AI companies are overreaching, and violating property laws. Shortly after the interview with Altman, Twitter cofounder Jack Dorsey seemed to offer support for Altman’s view, posting “delete all ip law” on X, with Elon Musk replying, “I agree.”
Crossing the Rubicon into Authoritarianism
In the course of just a few days, Americans have cataloged a laundry list of signs that the country has reached a tipping point into authoritarianism: SignalGate; “Liberation Day” tariffs; reversal of (some) tariffs (maybe); deportations to El Salvador; defiance of the Supreme Court; asserting that “home growns” (aka citizens) are next; taking control of Columbia University by placing it into receivership; bullying law firms to provide pro-bono services supportive of the regime; indiscriminate revocation of student visas; calling for the revocation of the broadcast license for CBS over dislike of 60 Minutes content; attempts to criminalize media figures like Norm Eisen; investigation of former Trump administration officials Miles Taylor and Chris Krebs on grounds of treason; forcing Americans to use X to interact with the Social Security administration; widespread DOGE cuts of programs and agencies without Congressional approval; decline of the dollar under pressure from tariffs and market chaos. The list goes on and on.
People also expressed grave concerns about interacting with US Customs, and discussed strategies for dealing with their devices at the border crossing. One TED speaker, a comedian, returning to the States was asked if they made any mention of politicians in their talk. Other attendees discussed strategies for locking down their computers and phones (“create a user account with nothing special in it” or “turn off Face ID and decline to provide a PIN.”) Some discussed mailing their devices home to avoid having them on their person. Regardless of the details, it is a massive red flag that law abiding citizens of any country are having to consider such strategies, with most expressing deep alarm at that fact.
Many also shared their intention to establish residency outside the United States. While the stereotype of liberals fleeing conservative regimes goes back decades, concerns now transcend mere political displeasure.
Some involved in media, non-profits, relief work, science, and other efforts requiring international coordination are now wondering if they will be able to remain in the United States without interference. Large, established non-profit organizations now face the prospect of having their tax status revoked, which can be executed as an administrative action within the Internal Revenue Service with no due process.
The United States has transformed into a fully authoritarian kleptocracy. If the government can take control of a private university (Columbia), independent non-profits (US Institute of Peace), detain and search citizens at the border without a warrant, disappear residents (and soon citizens) to a prison another country with no recourse, and defy the Supreme Court, it’s clear that the Constitution simply no longer applies.
Canada Isn’t Having It
Speaking with Canadians, they are re-energized at the thought of recasting Canadian identity in contrast to their delinquent neighbors to the south. Where the Canadian flag was, a year ago, a symbol of right-wing nationalism, today it represents level-headed liberalism. In Vancouver, it is not uncommon to see the maple leaf flag displayed proudly beside a flag for Ukraine — unthinkable a year ago.
The selection of Prime Minister Mark Carney seems to have been a stroke of genius that may ward off the advances of the lab-grown libertarian Pierre Poilievre, who otherwise might have had a better chance to move Canada more in the direction of Trumpian policy. People here do not take the idea of Canada becoming a “51st State” even remotely seriously, and when one considers the diversity and density of Canada’s largest cities, it’s obvious that any Americans floating this idea have no idea what they’re talking about. Canada’s national election on April 28 will offer a clearer idea about where the country is headed, but right now it appears to be on a hopeful trajectory.
Living in the Matrix?
Being TED, the idea that we might be living in a simulation naturally came up amongst the assembled technologists, philosophers, and scientists. But most concluded that no such exotic explanation was necessary to explain what we observe.
Individuals with high agency (such as Musk, Trump, Putin) have simply decided to ignore consensus reality and the laws and norms that previously shaped it. They are following their own agenda and we’re all being dragged into a new reality, whether we like it or not.
In fighting it, we are lured into engaging with the old systems — wasting time spinning the knobs labeled checks and balances, finding they do nothing. What may happen next is anyone’s guess. But we’re running out of time.
State level remedies (think Attorneys General and State Legislators taking action against Musk and friends) and actions by other countries (200% tariffs on Tesla in Europe, anyone?) might be solutions that can slow the grinding of our institutional gears.
Conferences Are People
There’s plenty else going on in the world of TED, as usual — talks touting advancements in science, AI, the arts, medicine, and the like. You’ll see those talks online soon. TED itself is in the process of gifting itself to a new owner, and they’re reviewing proposals for that now. Some of the talks and sessions inadvertently advanced some unsavory agendas. And there’s plenty of room for principled critique of TED and its model, with its tendency towards a glossy blend of feel-good slacktivism and McLuhan-cool presentations.
But the conference itself is loaded with smart, interesting people from around the world, genuinely trying to do good and useful work. The real conversations are in the hallways, at the bar, and at dinner. And never in sixteen years of attendance at various TED events have I heard those people more concerned about the state of the world.
Dave Troy is the volunteer co-curator of TEDxMidAtlantic in Washington, D.C., an independently produced TED event, scheduled next for November 1, 2025.
TED has always been this platform for bold, sometimes utopian ideas—but reading about how the talks this year had a darker, more urgent tone was honestly kind of sobering.
The article does a good job of connecting the dots between what’s happening in the U.S. politically and how the global community is perceiving it. It’s unsettling to realize how quickly democratic norms can erode, and how easily we can normalize things that would’ve been unthinkable just a few years ago. The fact that this shift is being discussed so openly in a high-profile forum like TED says a lot.
I also appreciated the piece’s nuance—it doesn’t scream panic, but it doesn’t sugarcoat either. It’s a wake-up call, not just for politicians and institutions, but for everyday people who maybe haven’t been paying close attention.
Definitely makes me want to go back and actually watch some of the talks mentioned. If nothing else, it’s a reminder that we’re not immune to the kinds of backsliding we usually associate with “other countries.”
The framing of “authoritarian drift” isn’t just some academic term anymore—it’s something people are seeing, feeling, and talking about on an international stage. What really stuck with me was how speakers weren’t just critiquing policy decisions, but warning about how quickly public trust, civil discourse, and institutions can erode under sustained political pressure.
It’s unsettling to think that conversations like these are now mainstream at a platform like TED, and even more so that many of the points raised—voter suppression, judicial manipulation, media control—don’t feel far-fetched anymore. They’re slowly becoming normalized.
I appreciate that this piece didn’t feel alarmist for the sake of it. Instead, it was a calm but urgent call to attention. It reminded me that democracy isn’t something you just have—it’s something you have to actively protect.